How to use the checklist
- Pick a sample. Test a representative sample, as the W3C's evaluation methodology (WCAG-EM) recommends: the home page, one page of each template, a form, and complete journeys such as sign-up, contact or checkout.
- Test in this order. Keyboard only (Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, Space, arrow keys), then zoom to 200% and 400%, then a screen reader (NVDA on Windows or VoiceOver on Mac), then color contrast, then the content itself: alt text, headings, link text, error messages.
- Answer strictly. "Yes" only when every page in the sample passes; "partly" when some do; "not applicable" only when the site has no such content (no video, no time limits).
- Fix Level A first. The plan lists failures at Level A before AA, then the partial ones, with who usually fixes each: design, content or development.
Why WCAG 2.2 AA is the target
WCAG 2.2 became a W3C Recommendation on 5 October 2023, and in October 2025 it was approved as the international standard ISO/IEC 40500:2025. The W3C says the 2.0 and 2.1 success criteria are essentially the same in 2.2, except that 4.1.1 Parsing is obsolete and removed, so a site that meets 2.2 AA also covers what 2.1 AA asks.
In the United States, DOJ's Title II rule requires state and local governments to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA; an interim final rule of 20 April 2026 moved the deadlines to 26 April 2027 and 26 April 2028, depending on size. For businesses, DOJ's position is that Title III of the ADA covers their websites, without a technical standard in a regulation; its web guidance points to WCAG. Our guide to ADA website compliance covers what that means in practice.
In Latin America, Colombia's Resolución 1519 de 2020 and Brazil's ABNT NBR 17225 also build on WCAG; see our WCAG 2.2 reference in Spanish and our guide to Brazil's accessibility law (in Portuguese).
What's new in WCAG 2.2
Nine success criteria are new in 2.2; six of them are at Level A or AA and are marked "New in 2.2" in the checklist:
- 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum), AA: sticky headers, cookie banners and chat buttons must not completely hide the element that has keyboard focus.
- 2.5.7 Dragging Movements, AA: anything done by dragging can also be done with a single tap or click.
- 2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum), AA: targets are at least 24 by 24 CSS pixels, or have enough space around them.
- 3.2.6 Consistent Help, A: help (contact details, a chat, a help page) appears in the same place across pages.
- 3.3.7 Redundant Entry, A: people aren't asked to type the same information twice in one process.
- 3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum), AA: signing in doesn't depend on a cognitive test such as remembering or transcribing a code, unless there's an alternative such as pasting or a password manager.
What a self-check can't tell you
A checklist records what your team found; it doesn't prove conformance. The W3C is explicit that evaluation tools can't determine accessibility: they help, but some checks need human judgement. The same goes for overlays: in 2025 the FTC ordered accessiBe to pay USD 1 million over claims that its tool could make any website compliant. If you need evidence for a buyer, a procurement process or a regulator, an audit tests a defined sample with assistive technology and documents each criterion.
From self-check to audit
Send us your results and we'll tell you what we'd test. Our web accessibility audit (WCAG 2.2 AA, from USD 690) combines automated scans with manual keyboard, screen reader, zoom and contrast testing and gives you a prioritized report; we can also fix what it finds. Our guide to what an accessibility audit costs compares published prices if you're collecting quotes.
Questions before you choose
How many success criteria does WCAG 2.2 AA have?
55 at Levels A and AA: 31 at Level A and 24 at Level AA. WCAG 2.2 added nine criteria (six at A or AA, three at AAA) and removed 4.1.1 Parsing.
What's new in WCAG 2.2?
At Levels A and AA: Focus Not Obscured (2.4.11), Dragging Movements (2.5.7), Target Size (2.5.8), Consistent Help (3.2.6), Redundant Entry (3.3.7) and Accessible Authentication (3.3.8). 4.1.1 Parsing was removed as obsolete.
Does the ADA require WCAG 2.2?
No regulation names WCAG 2.2. DOJ's Title II rule requires WCAG 2.1 AA for state and local governments, with deadlines in 2027 and 2028; for businesses under Title III there is no technical standard in a regulation, and DOJ's guidance points to WCAG. Meeting 2.2 AA covers 2.1 AA.
Does passing an automated scan mean my site is accessible?
No. The W3C says evaluation tools can't determine accessibility; many criteria need a person, a keyboard and a screen reader. Use scans to find issues fast, then test manually.
Where are my answers stored?
In your own browser only (local storage). Nothing is sent to Dardo unless you press the button to send your results to the contact form, and even then nothing is sent until you submit the form.
Is this checklist enough for an accessibility statement or a VPAT?
It's a good starting point for your team, but a conformance report should rest on a documented evaluation of a defined sample. An audit provides that.
Sources & further reading
Sources behind this page, with further detail from the original publishers.
- W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2w3.org
- W3C: Understanding WCAG 2.2w3.org
- W3C: What's new in WCAG 2.2w3.org
- W3C: WCAG-EM evaluation methodologyw3.org
- W3C: Selecting web accessibility evaluation toolsw3.org
- W3C: WCAG 2.2 approved as ISO/IEC 40500:2025w3.org
- ADA.gov: Guidance on web accessibility and the ADAada.gov
- ADA.gov: Fact sheet on the Title II web ruleada.gov
- Federal Register: Extension of compliance dates (20 April 2026)federalregister.gov
- FTC: Final order requiring accessiBe to pay USD 1 millionftc.gov