--- title: "Fastest website platform? Core Web Vitals by country — Dardo" description: "Compare WordPress, Webflow, Framer, Wix, Shopify, Astro, Next.js and 24 more on real-user Core Web Vitals and Lighthouse, in the US and Latin America." url: "https://dardo.studio/en/tools/website-platform-speed-report/" language: "en" translations: {"es":"https://dardo.studio/es/herramientas/velocidad-plataformas-web/","pt":"https://dardo.studio/pt/ferramentas/velocidade-plataformas-web/"} updated: "2026-10-15" --- Free tools # Website platform speed report: Core Web Vitals by platform and country Which website platform is fastest? This report answers with Google's own field data instead of a lab test: the share of real sites on each platform that pass Core Web Vitals for real Chrome visitors, with Lighthouse medians and page weight alongside, for the United States, Latin America and Spain. It updates every month from the HTTP Archive. By Dardo editorial team · Updated Oct 15, 2026 · 7 min read [Get a proposal](https://dardo.studio/en/contact/?service=website-speed-optimization) **Form fields** - Country: United States; Colombia; Mexico; Brazil; Argentina; Chile; Peru; Spain; All countries - Rank by: Sites passing Core Web Vitals; Good LCP (loading); Good INP (responsiveness); Good CLS (visual stability); Lighthouse performance (median); Lighthouse accessibility (median); Lighthouse SEO (median); Page weight (median); JavaScript (median) - Mobile - Desktop - All - CMS - Website builders - E-commerce - Frameworks ## Sites passing Core Web Vitals: United States, mobile Share of sites on each platform whose real visitors in Chrome get a good experience on all three Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP and CLS at the 75th percentile, over 28 days). This is Google's own field data. 1. Duda · 92% · 13,371 sites 2. GoDaddy Website Builder · 90.8% · 2,445 sites 3. Wix · 88.7% · 37,229 sites 4. Ghost · 88.1% · 823 sites 5. Hostinger Website Builder · 86% · 257 sites 6. Shopify · 85.5% · 118,969 sites 7. Astro · 84.2% · 9,292 sites 8. Hugo · 83.5% · 933 sites 9. Squarespace · 82.9% · 43,207 sites 10. Framer · 81.7% · 1,966 sites 11. Webflow · 80.2% · 16,374 sites 12. Drupal · 77.1% · 22,373 sites 13. BigCommerce · 72.3% · 7,520 sites 14. Joomla · 66.6% · 4,790 sites 15. Todos os sites (média) · 63.3% · 1,288,504 sites 16. WordPress · 62% · 352,468 sites 17. SvelteKit · 57.1% · 2,332 sites 18. WordPress + Divi · 56.6% · 29,242 sites 19. WordPress + Elementor · 55.6% · 86,228 sites 20. WooCommerce · 54.7% · 54,089 sites 21. PrestaShop · 54.5% · 836 sites 22. Next.js · 51.6% · 65,900 sites 23. Nuxt · 49.1% · 18,446 sites 24. Magento (Adobe Commerce) · 49% · 5,393 sites 25. Remix · 47% · 1,412 sites 26. Gatsby · 45.4% · 2,696 sites 27. Bubble · 19.6% · 214 sites 28. VTEX · 4.8% · 290 sites Too few sites in United States to show reliable numbers (fewer than 100): Jimdo, Nuvemshop, Tiendanube, Tray. __All metrics, United States, mobile, September 2026__ | Platform | Pass CWV | Good LCP | Good INP | Good CLS | Lighthouse perf. | Lighthouse a11y | Page weight | JavaScript | Sites | | ------------------------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | ---------------- | --------------- | ----------- | ---------- | --------- | | Duda | 92% | 97.6% | 98.4% | 94.5% | 53 | 92 | 2.2 MB | 1 MB | 13,371 | | GoDaddy Website Builder | 90.8% | 97.3% | 98.2% | 93.3% | 60 | 85 | 2.2 MB | 0.92 MB | 2,445 | | Wix | 88.7% | 91.6% | 96.6% | 98.4% | 63 | 94 | 2.7 MB | 1.7 MB | 37,229 | | Ghost | 88.1% | 96.1% | 98.4% | 91.7% | 66 | 93 | 2.7 MB | 1.3 MB | 823 | | Hostinger Website Builder | 86% | 87.5% | 99.4% | 98.5% | 56 | 96 | 1.7 MB | 0.41 MB | 257 | | Shopify | 85.5% | 92.1% | 95.1% | 94.2% | 45 | 92 | 4.5 MB | 2.6 MB | 118,969 | | Astro | 84.2% | 91.7% | 92.6% | 94.9% | 68 | 97 | 1.5 MB | 0.83 MB | 9,292 | | Hugo | 83.5% | 92.5% | 92.6% | 91.5% | 70 | 91 | 1.4 MB | 0.35 MB | 933 | | Squarespace | 82.9% | 88.6% | 98.6% | 92.9% | 30 | 95 | 3.7 MB | 1.5 MB | 43,207 | | Framer | 81.7% | 89.5% | 88.2% | 95.5% | 66 | 88 | 3.1 MB | 0.96 MB | 1,966 | | Webflow | 80.2% | 86.4% | 92.4% | 94.7% | 62 | 91 | 3.8 MB | 1.1 MB | 16,374 | | Drupal | 77.1% | 85.4% | 93.5% | 92.4% | 52 | 94 | 2.8 MB | 0.91 MB | 22,373 | | BigCommerce | 72.3% | 92.6% | 98.1% | 77.5% | 37 | 85 | 3 MB | 1.2 MB | 7,520 | | Joomla | 66.6% | 74% | 94.7% | 89.5% | 41 | 87 | 3.1 MB | 0.7 MB | 4,790 | | Todos os sites (média) | 63.3% | 74.8% | 87.3% | 85.1% | 48 | 90 | 3 MB | 1.1 MB | 1,288,504 | | WordPress | 62% | 70.4% | 92.6% | 88.1% | 46 | 89 | 3.1 MB | 0.89 MB | 352,468 | | SvelteKit | 57.1% | 69.8% | 82.2% | 82% | 62 | 93 | 1.8 MB | 0.52 MB | 2,332 | | WordPress + Divi | 56.6% | 64.1% | 96.7% | 85.8% | 38 | 81 | 3.4 MB | 0.87 MB | 29,242 | | WordPress + Elementor | 55.6% | 61.6% | 94.4% | 90.2% | 42 | 90 | 3.4 MB | 0.93 MB | 86,228 | | WooCommerce | 54.7% | 59.3% | 96.8% | 91.3% | 40 | 89 | 3.3 MB | 1 MB | 54,089 | | PrestaShop | 54.5% | 58.3% | 95.9% | 87.6% | 38 | 82 | 3.2 MB | 1.1 MB | 836 | | Next.js | 51.6% | 67.7% | 75.9% | 80.5% | 53 | 93 | 2.5 MB | 1.1 MB | 65,900 | | Nuxt | 49.1% | 68.1% | 83.9% | 69.9% | 42 | 93 | 4.4 MB | 1.5 MB | 18,446 | | Magento (Adobe Commerce) | 49% | 58.9% | 94% | 76.5% | 39 | 83 | 3.7 MB | 1.6 MB | 5,393 | | Remix | 47% | 61.3% | 89.3% | 82% | 51 | 90 | 2.7 MB | 1.3 MB | 1,412 | | Gatsby | 45.4% | 64.7% | 78.1% | 72.1% | 50 | 89 | 2.4 MB | 1.1 MB | 2,696 | | Bubble | 19.6% | 27.6% | 89.6% | 54.6% | 27 | 74 | 3.6 MB | 2.3 MB | 214 | | VTEX | 4.8% | 9.8% | 57.3% | 19.1% | 38 | 81 | 4.5 MB | 2.5 MB | 290 | Data: Chrome UX Report and Lighthouse via the HTTP Archive technology report, September 2026 (the latest monthly release). Sites are counted by origin; platforms are detected on the home page and one inner page. ### Is your site slower than its platform's average? Tell us what it runs on. We'll check your own field data, say what's holding it back and whether fixing it in place or moving platforms makes more sense. Your site runs on ## Key takeaways - Compare platforms within one country: in September 2026, 80% of Webflow sites passed Core Web Vitals on mobile in the US, against 44% in Colombia. - Hosted builders lead on pass rates (Jimdo, Duda, Wix); Next.js sites pass less often than WordPress sites, mostly on responsiveness (INP). - Astro sites ship little JavaScript and share the highest median Lighthouse performance; WordPress sites struggle with loading (LCP), not responsiveness. - A platform's average is not your site: field data for your own pages decides whether to fix in place or move. ## How to read the report Choose a country, a device and what to rank by. Each bar is the share of sites (origins) built on that platform with a good result; the number beside it is how many sites were measured, and the line on the right is the last twelve months. Platforms with fewer than 100 measured sites in a country are listed below the chart instead of ranked, because a handful of sites can swing their numbers. Compare platforms within one country, not across countries. Connection speeds and phones differ by market, so the same platform scores very differently in New York and in Bogotá. The table under the chart shows every metric for the country and device you chose, and the link button keeps your view so you can share it. ## What the September 2026 data shows For the country-by-country story (how many sites pass in Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Peru, and why mobile fails), read [Core Web Vitals in Latin America](https://dardo.studio/en/blog/core-web-vitals-latin-america/). - **The country matters as much as the platform.** On mobile, 80.2% of Webflow sites passed Core Web Vitals in the United States, against 43.6% in Colombia, 50.1% in Mexico and 45.4% in Brazil. WordPress went from 62.0% in the US to 24.7% in Colombia. - **Mobile is where Latin American sites fail.** In Colombia, 43.6% of Webflow sites passed on mobile and 69.0% on desktop; for WordPress, 24.7% and 38.6%. - **Hosted builders lead.** Worldwide, Jimdo (93.8% on mobile), Duda (85.8%), GoDaddy's website builder (82.0%) and Wix (80.9%) had the highest pass rates, ahead of Shopify (76.2%), Webflow (71.3%), Astro (71.1%), Squarespace (71.0%) and Framer (70.8%). - **Next.js sites pass less often than WordPress sites**: 35.7% on mobile worldwide, against 48.3%. Responsiveness is the gap: 59.7% of Next.js sites have a good INP, against 80–97% for WordPress, Webflow, Framer, Wix, Squarespace and Shopify. A framework doesn't make a site fast; how much work it leaves to the phone does. - **Astro sites ship little JavaScript**: a median of 0.41 MB on mobile worldwide, against 0.82 MB for Next.js and Framer, 0.93 MB for Webflow and 1.8 MB for Wix, and they share the highest median Lighthouse performance score (70) with Hugo. - **WordPress struggles with loading, not responsiveness.** Worldwide, 55.4% of WordPress sites have a good LCP while 90.3% have a good INP; with the Elementor page builder, good LCP falls to 41.0%. - **Lab scores and field data disagree.** Squarespace's median Lighthouse performance score is 30, yet 71.0% of its sites pass Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google uses the field data. - **Almost everyone improved over the year.** From September 2025 to September 2026, Webflow went from 64.0% to 71.3% on mobile worldwide, Astro from 61.6% to 71.1%, Next.js from 28.1% to 35.7% and WordPress from 45.0% to 48.3%; Shopify stayed at 76.2%. ## Why platforms differ, and why your site may not match its platform - **Who hosts it.** Hosted builders (Wix, Duda, Squarespace, Webflow, Framer, Shopify) control servers, caching, image resizing and the CDN for every site. Self-hosted WordPress, Drupal or Next.js sites are only as fast as the hosting and setup someone chose. - **What ships to the browser.** Themes, page builders, plugins, tag managers, chat widgets and client-side rendering all add JavaScript, which is what hurts INP on mid-range phones. - **What gets built on it.** These numbers describe the sites that use each platform, not the platform in ideal hands. Next.js powers complex web apps as well as marketing sites; WordPress runs everything from one-page brochures to large shops. Correlation, not causation. - **Where the visitors are.** CrUX counts a visit in the country of the visitor. A US company with many Latin American visitors will see lower numbers than its platform's US average. ## Using the data to choose or leave a platform Start with your own site: [PageSpeed Insights](https://pagespeed.web.dev/) and Search Console's Core Web Vitals report show your field data, per page group. If your pages fail where your platform's average passes, the cause is usually the build (images, fonts, third-party scripts, the theme) and it can be fixed in place; our [Core Web Vitals playbook](https://dardo.studio/en/blog/pass-core-web-vitals/) covers the usual fixes. Changing platforms makes sense when the platform itself blocks the fixes: you can't control the scripts it injects, the hosting is out of your hands, or every fix fights a page builder. Then compare the platforms you'd consider in the country your visitors come from, and plan the move so rankings carry over, with a [redirect map](https://dardo.studio/en/tools/redirect-map-generator/) and the [migration SEO checklist](https://dardo.studio/en/blog/website-migration-seo-checklist/). For two common choices, see [Webflow vs Framer](https://dardo.studio/en/blog/webflow-vs-framer/) and [Astro vs Next.js](https://dardo.studio/en/blog/astro-vs-nextjs/). ## How the data is collected - **Core Web Vitals** come from the [Chrome UX Report](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux/methodology) (CrUX): anonymous measurements from real Chrome users, aggregated by origin over 28 days. An origin passes when its 75th-percentile LCP is 2.5 seconds or less, INP 200 milliseconds or less and CLS 0.1 or less. Only sites popular enough to be in CrUX are counted. - **Platforms** are detected by the HTTP Archive, which crawls millions of sites every month and identifies technologies on the home page and one inner page. A site can count under several technologies (WordPress and Elementor, for example). - **Lighthouse scores and page weight** are lab measurements of home pages from the HTTP Archive's crawl, reported as medians. - **This page** reads the HTTP Archive's public technology report API when the site is built and shows the latest monthly release; the date under the chart says which month you're looking at. ## Questions before you choose **Which website platform is the fastest?** In the September 2026 data, hosted builders had the highest Core Web Vitals pass rates worldwide: Jimdo (93.8% of sites on mobile), Duda (85.8%), GoDaddy's website builder (82.0%) and Wix (80.9%), then Shopify, Webflow, Astro, Squarespace and Framer, all between 70% and 77%. The order changes by country, so check the one your visitors are in. **Is Webflow faster than WordPress?** On average, yes. Worldwide, 71.3% of Webflow sites passed Core Web Vitals on mobile against 48.3% of WordPress sites in September 2026, and the gap holds in every country in the report. A well-built WordPress site can still pass; the average WordPress site loads its main content too slowly (LCP). **Is Framer faster than Webflow?** They are close. Worldwide, 70.8% of Framer sites and 71.3% of Webflow sites passed on mobile in September 2026; Framer did better in Mexico and Brazil and Webflow in Colombia. Choose on editing, CMS and pricing rather than speed. **Does Next.js make a website faster?** Not by itself. In September 2026, 35.7% of Next.js sites passed on mobile worldwide, fewer than WordPress sites (48.3%), mostly because of responsiveness (INP). Many are complex apps; a Next.js marketing site that ships little JavaScript can pass easily. **Why are Latin American numbers lower than the US?** Visitors in Latin America use slower mobile connections and cheaper phones on average, and many sites are served from the US or Europe. The same platform passes far less often in Colombia, Mexico or Brazil, so compare platforms within the country your visitors are in. **Will moving platforms fix my Core Web Vitals?** Only if the platform is what's blocking the fixes. Check your own field data first: most failing sites can be fixed in place by sizing images, cutting third-party scripts and simplifying the theme. **How often is the report updated?** Monthly. The HTTP Archive publishes a new release each month, and this page shows the latest one; the date under the chart says which month you're looking at. ## Sources & further reading Sources behind this page, with further detail from the original publishers. - [HTTP Archive: Technology Report](https://httparchive.org/reports/techreport/landing) · httparchive.org - [HTTP Archive: Technology Report APIs (GitHub)](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/tech-report-apis) · github.com - [Chrome for Developers: CrUX methodology](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux/methodology) · developer.chrome.com - [Chrome for Developers: CrUX metrics](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/crux/methodology/metrics) · developer.chrome.com - [web.dev: Web Vitals](https://web.dev/articles/vitals) · web.dev - [web.dev: How the Core Web Vitals thresholds were defined](https://web.dev/articles/defining-core-web-vitals-thresholds) · web.dev - [web.dev: INP is now a Core Web Vital](https://web.dev/blog/inp-cwv-launch) · web.dev - [Google Search Central: Core Web Vitals and Google Search results](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/core-web-vitals) · developers.google.com - [Web Almanac 2024: Methodology](https://almanac.httparchive.org/en/2024/methodology) · almanac.httparchive.org - [HTTP Archive: Wappalyzer technology detection (GitHub)](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/wappalyzer) · github.com - [PageSpeed Insights](https://pagespeed.web.dev/) · pagespeed.web.dev [Dardo](https://dardo.studio/) · [Free tools](https://dardo.studio/en/tools/) · Website platform speed report ## From platform averages to your own site Check your field data, fix what's fixable, and move only when the platform is the blocker. [01 · **Fix Core Web Vitals in place** · The field-data-first playbook: what usually fails on each metric and how to fix it.](https://dardo.studio/en/blog/pass-core-web-vitals/) · [02 · **Plan a platform move** · Website migration without losing rankings: redirects, content and checks before launch.](https://dardo.studio/en/services/website-migration/) · [03 · **Ask for a speed review** · Tell us your site and platform; we'll say what's holding it back and what it would take.](https://dardo.studio/en/contact/?service=website-speed-optimization) ## Keep exploring. - [Service · **Website speed and Core Web Vitals optimization**](https://dardo.studio/en/services/website-speed-optimization/) - [Service · **Website migration services without losing SEO**](https://dardo.studio/en/services/website-migration/) - [Service · **Astro development: fast content sites and migrations**](https://dardo.studio/en/services/astro-development/) - [Service · **Webflow design and development for marketing teams**](https://dardo.studio/en/services/webflow-development/) **More to explore** - [Service · **Framer website design and development for startups**](https://dardo.studio/en/services/framer-development/)